Latest adventures…

  • What pisses me off most about the British man who "went missing" for 5 years…

    Mr & Mrs Darwin in Panama…isn’t that he’s lieing, cheating and being a downright fraud to avoid paying back his debts, which apparently amount to tens of thousands. It’s that police search & rescue and detective resources, which are already scarce, were wasted on a man who consciously went into hiding.

    These are resources that should have been spent on fighting crime, supporting communities and working on other unsolved cases which deserve the attention.

    Mr and Mrs Darwin, you are greedy, selfish people and I feel sorry for anyone who failed to receive due care from the police and local authorities because of your shortsighted behaviour. Did you really think you’d live on forever without being caught? Idiots.

  • RAC Traffic report: More technology isn't always better

    I love tech. I truly do. In fact, I’ve got a severe condition called “gadgetitis”, which becomes particularly acute around tech expos and Christmas time where all sorts of new techy goodies are released. And I love beta versions, even though they’re flakier than Paris Hilton. I love sneak previews, even if the app turns out to only be worthy of the TechCrunch deadpool. It’s a terrible addiction and as far as I know, there are no cures.

    By the same logic, I almost always say that the more technology, the better. Almost.

    Today’s an exception. This is my plea to the RAC, once my most reliable source of up-to-date traffic news, to step away from the Flash animations and return to this old technology called text. The wonderful thing about text is that it’s clear, succint and doesn’t require any fancy plugins. It’s easy to use when on the road with only a phone at hand.

    RAC Traffic website goes Flash - ack!

    This new animation completely fails from a usability point of view:

    1. It doesn’t respect the KISS rule: Keeping it simple means it’s more widely accessible. Not everyone has Flash enabled. My iPhone certainly doesn’t. :S
    2. It’s utterly useless to someone who isn’t local. Very few cities, towns and villages are identified, no matter how close you zoom in. Why aren’t the primary non-motorway roads identified? It’s certainly not because the map is too cluttered!
    3. The usefulness of the information displayed is questionable, especially in comparison to the detailed alternative that used to be available. Is the slowdown due to sheer traffic density or are we dealing with a 6 car pile-up where the motorway might get closed? That’s far more likely to affect my decision of what to do next than telling me vehicles are travelling at 10mph.
    4. The colours, which represent severity of traffic, aren’t accompanied by a legend, so the user has to guess what the scale is!

    With the holidays coming and more people on motorways driving long distances to see family and friends, it can be a lifeline, helping us make a quick decision on whether a detour is needed. I’m afraid that the RAC designers didn’t do their homework here. Back to the drawing board, guys!

    [Crossposted to the Taptu blog here!]

  • Cambridge Congestion Charge: Your chance to speak!

    Below, I’ve copied an email I received from the administrator of the Cambridge Congestion Charge forum. I haven’t had the time to edit it or summarise it for my readers, but if you live in or work in Cambridge, please read this, go fill in the survey and let your councilors know that before they smack us with a charge, they’ll need to come up with some solutions.

    In my eyes, the first changes they should make are:
    1. Encourage carpooling by improving routes reserved to buses and cars with two or more people in it;
    2. Improve bus service so that it doesn’t take 3 times longer to get from A to B on the bus than in your own car (see Ottawa’s OC Transpo bus service for an example of a well thought-out plan);
    3. Do not include Science Parks in the areas covered, because that’s just money grabbing rather than problem-solving and makes the city look like a bunch of greedy idiots.

    Without further ado, here’s the email… Share this information far and wide!

    ————————-

    Hello,

    Firstly may I thank you for registering on the Cambridge Congestion Charge website. Secondly may I take this immediate opportunity to say that this will not be sending out regular emails to you.

    The Cambridge City Council has launched its public consultation. This basically seems to consist of an online web questionaire and a series of public roadshows around the Cambridgeshire region. I would urge you to take the online questionaire if you haven’t already done so, and visit one of the roadshows as well as contact your local Councillor (easy to use contact details are at the bottom of this email). In the run up to Christmas and New year this important issue may slip your mind and then it may be too late for you to get your point of view across.

    As you may know one of the main driving points behind introducing a congestion charge in Cambridge is the investment of a substantial amount of central government money into Cambridge’s transport infrastructure. This money has been offered in return for introducing a congestion charge.

    The full proposal document which will form the basis of the City councils bid to get the central government money has been written and is available for download from http://www.cambridgecongestioncharge.co.uk/cambridgecongestioncharge/cambridgecongestioncharge.pdf (copy and paste this link if you need to). The document gives insight into the extensive planning that the council has already made and pinpoints the locations of cameras that would catch motorists that don’t pay, along with plans for mobile vans operating at random locations. I strongly urge you to read this document as either way it will change your way of life in the near future. It is quite long and you have to read it closely to establish exactly what they want to do (such as make Huntingdon Road a one way street for cars going out of the city) but it really is worth it. If you don’t find out about it now and make your views known you may regret it in just a couple of years time.

    It also seems that normal “Joe Public” will have to pay a charge of £5 per day at current pricing which doesn’t take into account inflationary increases.

    Some useful links and information for you:

    City Council Proposal Download
    City Council Online Survey (watch out for closed and / or misleading questions & note that this is very difficult to find on the City Council website)

    City Council Road Show Locations (watch out for odd opening times)

    • The small hall, Guildhall, Cambridge – December 11 – 3-9pm
    • The recreation ground, Histon and Impington – December 12 – 3-9pm
    • The dining hall, Chatteris Community College – January 10 – 4-9pm
    • King Edward VII Memorial Hall, High Street, Newmarket – January 21 – 3-9pm
    • Sawston Village College, Sawston – January 23 – 3-9pm
    • Commemoration Hall, Huntingdon – January 24 – 3-9pm
    • The Grafton centre, Cambridge – January 26 – 9am-5pm
    • The Grafton centre, Cambridge – January 27 – 11am-4pm
    • Trumpington park and ride, Cambridge – January 30 – 6.30-8.30am and 5-8pm
    • Madingley Road park and ride, Cambridge – January 31 – 6.30-8.30am and 5-8pm
    • The Maltings, Ship Lane, Ely – February 5 – 3-9pm
    • Haverhill Arts Centre, Haverhill – February 6 – 3-9pm
    • The Free Church, Market Hill, St Ives – February 13 – 4-9pm

    Link to Contact details for all Cambridge City Councillors including email addresses, postal address and phone numbers: http://www.cambridge.gov.uk/ccm/navigation/about-the-council/councillors/

    Please remember to make your view known, especially directly to the council, and please feel free to come back to the cambridgecongestioncharge.co.uk website and continue contributing.

    If I can be of any assistance to you regarding this matter or using the website please do not hesitate to ask.

    Best Wishes,

    Cambridge Congestion Charge Website Administrator
    http://www.cambridgecongestioncharge.co.uk

  • Big discounts on Mac software

    This is just a quick little heads-up for my fellow Mac users, Give Good Food to Your Mac is giving some big discounts, varying from 30% if you buy 3 apps to 70% if you buy ten.

    None of the apps were particularly interesting to me, since I’m already pretty well equipped, but you’ll find the fabulous PixelMator, the popular Money and the useful CCSEdit apps, so it’s probably worth having a poke at the site if you’re new to Mac and need to equip yourself for cheap.

  • Felix catfood: Which one would you feed your kittens?

    .flickr-photo { border: solid 1px #000000; }
    .flickr-yourcomment { }
    .flickr-frame { text-align: left; padding: 3px; }
    .flickr-caption { font-size: 0.8em; margin-top: 0px; }

    Out of the pack we bought recently, there was one pouch (on the right) which was completely empty (yet sealed), then the middle pouch was completely unbranded, which I find really bloody odd. And finally the left one is the “control”, the normal kitten food pouch.

    I’ve written to Purina, and they got back to me, but I’ll be interested in seeing how they justify the unbranded pouches…

  • The Secret Strategies Behind Many 'Viral' Videos or why Dan Ackerman Greenberg is an idiot

    [Disclaimer: I realise the last thing I should be doing is giving this guy more visibility and mentions on the web, but his original article, as well as his follow-up REALLY rubbed me up the wrong way and I need to vent it out.]

    When I took on my first marketing role, some years ago now, I quickly realised that the term marketing, like sales came with a lot of negative baggage. Since then, I’ve met enough marketers who fit the awful cliché to see why the name has been sullied for good.

    I’ve made it my personal goal to never, ever fit in with the stereotype of the marketer who is willing to lie, cheat and sell his firstborn child for the sake of hitting some haphazard target numbers set by a boss in an executive leather chair in a clinical office boardroom. I want marketing to be about a great product and an honest passion for the community to whom it brings a solution to a problem. I only want to work for company directors who have visions I can agree with, and marketing managers who have their heart and their ethics in the right place. Call me idealistic or naïve, but that’s how this girl rolls.

    This morning, I came across a TechCrunch guest post by a guy called Dan who claims his viral video marketing agency can take average videos and shoot them into the viral fame sphere. He candidly starts with this introduction:

    “Have you ever watched a video with 100,000 views on YouTube and thought to yourself: “How the hell did that video get so many views?” Chances are pretty good that this didn’t happen naturally, but rather that some company worked hard to make it happen – some company like mine.”

    Now, I’m not new to paid blog posts, fake forum users and spam comments encouraging users to go view videos. I know very well how much money some companies will pay to get some of that hard-to-get attention time from viewers. In fact, I’ve been asked in the past to take part in every single one of these types of grey-area tactics, and have held my position. The Internet is polluted enough as it is, I won’t be adding to the spam that goes around by lowering myself to talking to myself on a public forum, pretending to be some teeny bopper who loves whatever product I’m asked to market.

    What rubs me the wrong way is the apparent pride with which Dan talks about his agency, while knowing very well that what he’s doing is a. ethically wrong, b. taking the lazy route, c. quite likely to one day blow up in his face.

    In his follow-up post, Dan apologises for the tone he took in his article and does a 180 degrees on his claims of spam tactics. His attempt at saving face with the sudden claim that he does not spam or manipulate people is pathetic and pretty damn weak.

    There are two scenarios that could’ve led Dan to require that second mea culpa post:

    • Either he does use dirty tactics and was a bit too honest, which makes him a moron for not foreseeing how others, with more ethics than him, would be incensed and angered by his post. If he can’t foresee consequences this obvious, do you really want him marketing your product?
    • Or he’s being a gusty bastard and did this specifically to get a rise out of people for the sake of some publicity, spicing his article with a few sensationalistic techniques he doesn’t necessarily always use. If that’s the case, he’s still an idiot for claiming to use frankly spammy techniques.

    Either way, Dan, it still makes you an ethically-twisted little shit.

    Unlike me, Ian Delaney doesn’t get his knickers in a twist, and focuses on the positives in Dan’s post, and highlights the things we can learn from successful viral videos.

    • Make it short: 15-30 seconds is ideal; break down long stories into bite-sized clips
    • Design for remixing: create a video that is simple enough to be remixed over and over again by others. Ex: “Dramatic Hamster”
    • Don’t make an outright ad: if a video feels like an ad, viewers won’t share it unless it’s really amazing. Ex: Sony Bravia
    • Make it shocking: give a viewer no choice but to investigate further. Ex: “UFO Haiti”
    • Use fake headlines: make the viewer say, “Holy shit, did that actually happen?!” Ex: “Stolen Nascar”
    • Appeal to sex: if all else fails, hire the most attractive women available to be in the video. Ex: “Yoga 4 Dudes”

    So while there’s a bit to learn from Dan’s posts, I just hope everyone remembers that there are plenty of ethical, community-centered and honest people in the marketing world who will agree that dodgy spamming and paid links just isn’t fair play. While dirty tricks might work short-term, you can’t build a community through it, and in the long run, that’s what matters.

  • Wondering what to get me for Christmas? How about Powerbook earrings?

    Powerbook Power button earringsThese are just awesome! I would absolutely love to have power button earrings.

    Posh frock, nice shoes, and geek earrings. Fun, a bit odd and unusual. How good would that be?

    925works also does other stuff, like bracelets and necklaces, made out of coins, spoons, and other types of metal.

    Otherwise, I’d happily settle for this Tetris scarf or these HTML earrings, which are unfortunately out of stock. :S

  • Find out if you're still a child at heart in one easy step

    Does this look as tempting to you as it does to both Russell and I?

    Ikea playpen balls

    It’s like there’s an invisible force field pulling me towards those. Not sure if I would’ve managed to resist, had I been there!

  • Jack & Rose checking out Super Mario Galaxy

    .flickr-photo { border: solid 1px #000000; }
    .flickr-yourcomment { }
    .flickr-frame { text-align: left; padding: 3px; }
    .flickr-caption { font-size: 0.8em; margin-top: 0px; }

    In their professional opinion, the game rates 11 out of 10. With the exception of intro scenes, which could do with some basic anti-aliasing.

    Best bit? That little blue hand that moves around the screen, definitely!